|
|
2011 - North American Open Pairs Flight "C" District 1 Final Session - October 29th, 2011 Note: As Montreal had 6.5 tables in C the finals Masterpoint totals have been revised. with the awards being: 25% Gold and 75% Red. Naop Flight-C 2 Session October 30, 2011 Average: 94.5 Section C Pair Pct Score Rank C/O Final O/A MPts ---- ----- ------ ---- ------ ------ --- -------- 4 73.81 139.50 1 103.50 243.00 1 5.67G/R Bob Feng - Jason Feng [Summary] 5 60.42 114.19 2 99.00 213.19 2 4.25G/R Mike Tanner - Dave Tanner [Summary] 4 57.67 109.00 2 97.88 206.88 3 3.19G/R Richard Dill - Diane Livingstone [Summary] 7 63.76 120.50 1 83.00 203.50 4 2.39G/R Ellen Ayer - Clare Morris [Summary] 3 46.43 87.75 114.19 201.94 5 1.89G/R Dan Regimbal - Joan Regimbal [Summary] 1 48.51 91.69 4 107.44 199.13 1.41Red Haixin Xu - Rick Sparkman [Summary] 5 46.30 87.50 108.00 195.50 1.34Red Cheryl Macintosh - Ginny Saunders [Summary] 2 51.85 98.00 3 95.06 193.06 0.67Red Frank Harlow - Gina Harlow [Summary] 8 49.47 93.50 4 91.13 184.63 0.47Red Gilbert Ross Meredith - Guy Maugeais [Summary] 1 46.56 88.00 96.00 184.00 0.47Red Carol Weir - Marie Rose [Summary] 3 47.09 89.00 92.50 181.50 Dodi Walsh - Floyd Kelly [Summary] 9 47.62 90.00 84.94 174.94 Melinda Maclean - Margaret House [Summary] 2 39.29 74.25 98.00 172.25 0.67Red Frank Miller - Don Lutz [Summary] 7 50.30 95.06 3 75.94 171.00 0.67Red Cynthia Burney - Linda Smith [Summary] 6 41.67 78.75 92.00 170.75 Mary Lynn Macdonald - Candace Flemming [Summary] 8 41.96 79.31 83.00 162.31 Celia Cobbett - PATTIE MOODY [Summary] 6 37.30 70.50 84.94 155.44 Ray Long - Shirley Long [Summary] =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 1 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 430 7.00 0.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 100 0.50 6.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 100 0.50 6.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 90 2.00 5.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 7-Burney-Smith 130 4.00 3.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 9-Maclean-House 130 4.00 3.00 6-Long-Long vs 2-Miller-Lutz 130 4.00 3.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 4-Feng-Feng 400 6.00 1.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 2 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 150 2.00 5.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 400 0.50 6.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 50 5.00 2.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 100 6.50 0.50 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 7-Burney-Smith 130 3.50 3.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 9-Maclean-House 100 6.50 0.50 6-Long-Long vs 2-Miller-Lutz 400 0.50 6.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 4-Feng-Feng 130 3.50 3.50 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 3 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 110 4.00 3.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 110 4.00 3.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 50 1.00 6.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 50 1.00 6.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 7-Burney-Smith 50 1.00 6.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 9-Maclean-House 110 4.00 3.00 6-Long-Long vs 2-Miller-Lutz 200 6.50 0.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 4-Feng-Feng 200 6.50 0.50 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 4 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 0.00 7.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 9-Maclean-House 120 2.50 4.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 2-Miller-Lutz 120 2.50 4.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 4-Feng-Feng 180 5.00 2.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 130 4.00 3.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 100 1.00 6.00 6-Long-Long vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 630 6.50 0.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 630 6.50 0.50 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 5-Tanner-Tanner =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 5 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 140 1.00 6.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 9-Maclean-House 110 3.50 3.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 2-Miller-Lutz 140 1.00 6.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 4-Feng-Feng 110 7.00 0.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 100 5.00 2.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 140 1.00 6.00 6-Long-Long vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 90 6.00 1.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 110 3.50 3.50 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 5-Tanner-Tanner =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 6 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 140 0.50 6.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 9-Maclean-House 100 5.50 1.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 2-Miller-Lutz 100 3.00 4.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 4-Feng-Feng 110 2.00 5.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 100 5.50 1.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 100 5.50 1.50 6-Long-Long vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 100 5.50 1.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 140 0.50 6.50 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 5-Tanner-Tanner =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 7 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 1.50 5.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 620 4.50 2.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 620 4.50 2.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 650 7.00 0.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 100 1.50 5.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 7-Burney-Smith 620 4.50 2.50 6-Long-Long vs 9-Maclean-House 620 4.50 2.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 2-Miller-Lutz 300 0.00 7.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 4-Feng-Feng =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 8 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 110 6.00 1.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 110 6.00 1.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 100 1.00 6.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 100 1.00 6.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 50 3.00 4.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 7-Burney-Smith 90 4.00 3.00 6-Long-Long vs 9-Maclean-House 110 6.00 1.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 2-Miller-Lutz 100 1.00 6.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 4-Feng-Feng =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 9 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 150 4.00 3.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 200 7.00 0.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 1100 0.00 7.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 200 2.00 5.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 90 5.00 2.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 7-Burney-Smith 100 6.00 1.00 6-Long-Long vs 9-Maclean-House 200 2.00 5.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 2-Miller-Lutz 200 2.00 5.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 4-Feng-Feng =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 10 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 3.00 4.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 7-Burney-Smith 200 6.00 1.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 9-Maclean-House 100 3.00 4.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 2-Miller-Lutz 800 0.00 7.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 4-Feng-Feng 200 6.00 1.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 200 1.00 6.00 6-Long-Long vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 200 6.00 1.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 100 3.00 4.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 11 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 170 0.00 7.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 7-Burney-Smith 120 3.00 4.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 9-Maclean-House 110 5.00 2.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 2-Miller-Lutz 140 1.50 5.50 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 4-Feng-Feng 110 5.00 2.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 110 5.00 2.00 6-Long-Long vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 140 1.50 5.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 100 7.00 0.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 12 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 110 4.50 2.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 7-Burney-Smith 110 4.50 2.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 9-Maclean-House 150 6.00 1.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 2-Miller-Lutz 100 2.00 5.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 4-Feng-Feng 200 0.00 7.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 50 3.00 4.00 6-Long-Long vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 140 1.00 6.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 600 7.00 0.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 13 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 90 3.00 4.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 90 3.00 4.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 90 3.00 4.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 120 7.00 0.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 90 3.00 4.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 90 3.00 4.00 6-Long-Long vs 7-Burney-Smith 90 3.00 4.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 9-Maclean-House 90 3.00 4.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 2-Miller-Lutz =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 14 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 50 4.00 3.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 100 5.00 2.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 100 2.50 4.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 420 7.00 0.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 100 2.50 4.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 130 0.00 7.00 6-Long-Long vs 7-Burney-Smith 300 6.00 1.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 9-Maclean-House 110 1.00 6.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 2-Miller-Lutz =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 15 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 100 5.50 1.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 420 3.00 4.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 480 0.50 6.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 150 7.00 0.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 420 3.00 4.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 480 0.50 6.50 6-Long-Long vs 7-Burney-Smith 420 3.00 4.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 9-Maclean-House 100 5.50 1.50 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 2-Miller-Lutz =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 16 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 150 4.50 2.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 150 4.50 2.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 7-Burney-Smith 150 4.50 2.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 9-Maclean-House 150 4.50 2.50 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 2-Miller-Lutz 300 0.00 7.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 4-Feng-Feng 140 2.00 5.00 6-Long-Long vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 400 7.00 0.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 100 1.00 6.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 1-Xu-Sparkman =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 17 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 50 2.50 4.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 50 2.50 4.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 7-Burney-Smith 100 6.00 1.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 9-Maclean-House 50 2.50 4.50 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 2-Miller-Lutz 110 0.00 7.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 4-Feng-Feng 50 5.00 2.00 6-Long-Long vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 110 7.00 0.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 50 2.50 4.50 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 1-Xu-Sparkman =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 18 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 420 0.50 6.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 600 6.50 0.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 7-Burney-Smith 200 5.00 2.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 9-Maclean-House 600 6.50 0.50 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 2-Miller-Lutz 420 0.50 6.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 4-Feng-Feng 170 2.00 5.00 6-Long-Long vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 50 3.00 4.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 100 4.00 3.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 1-Xu-Sparkman =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 19 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 90 5.00 2.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 4-Feng-Feng 100 2.00 5.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 50 3.50 3.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 140 0.50 6.50 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 200 7.00 0.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 140 0.50 6.50 6-Long-Long vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 100 6.00 1.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 7-Burney-Smith 50 3.50 3.50 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 9-Maclean-House =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 20 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 620 3.50 3.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 4-Feng-Feng 620 3.50 3.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 620 3.50 3.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 650 7.00 0.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 170 0.00 7.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 620 3.50 3.50 6-Long-Long vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 620 3.50 3.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 7-Burney-Smith 620 3.50 3.50 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 9-Maclean-House =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 21 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 230 1.00 6.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 4-Feng-Feng 140 4.50 2.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 50 6.50 0.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 140 4.50 2.50 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 210 2.00 5.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 460 0.00 7.00 6-Long-Long vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 50 6.50 0.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 7-Burney-Smith 150 3.00 4.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 9-Maclean-House =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 22 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 660 1.50 5.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 660 1.50 5.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 630 4.00 3.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 7-Burney-Smith 600 5.00 2.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 9-Maclean-House 660 1.50 5.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 2-Miller-Lutz 660 1.50 5.50 6-Long-Long vs 4-Feng-Feng 130 6.00 1.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 100 7.00 0.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 23 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 140 1.50 5.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 90 4.00 3.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 110 7.00 0.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 7-Burney-Smith 100 3.00 4.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 9-Maclean-House 100 5.50 1.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 2-Miller-Lutz 140 1.50 5.50 6-Long-Long vs 4-Feng-Feng 100 5.50 1.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 200 0.00 7.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 24 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 450 7.00 0.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 480 4.50 2.50 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 500 1.00 6.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 7-Burney-Smith 480 4.50 2.50 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 9-Maclean-House 480 4.50 2.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 2-Miller-Lutz 500 1.00 6.00 6-Long-Long vs 4-Feng-Feng 480 4.50 2.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 500 1.00 6.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 25 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 420 6.50 0.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 2-Miller-Lutz 50 3.00 4.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 4-Feng-Feng 50 3.00 4.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 50 3.00 4.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 420 6.50 0.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 50 3.00 4.00 6-Long-Long vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 50 3.00 4.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 100 0.00 7.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 7-Burney-Smith =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 26 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 620 5.00 2.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 2-Miller-Lutz 100 2.00 5.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 4-Feng-Feng 300 0.50 6.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 620 5.00 2.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 650 7.00 0.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 300 0.50 6.50 6-Long-Long vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 200 3.00 4.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 620 5.00 2.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 7-Burney-Smith =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 27 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES N-S E-W N-S E-W 420 3.50 3.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 2-Miller-Lutz 450 1.00 6.00 2-Harlow-Harlow vs 4-Feng-Feng 100 6.00 1.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 6-Macdonald-Flemming 170 5.00 2.00 4-Dill-Livingstone vs 8-Cobbett-MOODY 450 1.00 6.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 1-Xu-Sparkman 450 1.00 6.00 6-Long-Long vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal 420 3.50 3.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 5-Tanner-Tanner 100 7.00 0.00 8-Meredith-Maugeais vs 7-Burney-Smith =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Carol Weir - Marie Rose Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 1 430 7 15 S N-S 6 100 5.5 2 E N-S 1 -150 2 16 W E-W 5 150 4.5 3 S E-W 1 110 4 17 N NONE 5 -50 2.5 4 W BOTH 9 -100 0 18 E N-S 5 -420 0.5 5 N N-S 9 -140 1 19 S E-W 4 90 5 6 E E-W 9 -140 0.5 20 W BOTH 4 620 3.5 7 S BOTH 8 -100 1.5 21 N N-S 4 -230 1 8 W NONE 8 110 6 22 E E-W 3 -660 1.5 9 N E-W 8 -150 4 23 S BOTH 3 -140 1.5 10 E BOTH 7 -100 3 24 W NONE 3 -450 7 11 S NONE 7 -170 0 25 N E-W 2 420 6.5 12 W N-S 7 110 4.5 26 E BOTH 2 620 5 13 N BOTH 6 90 3 27 S NONE 2 -420 3.5 14 E NONE 6 50 4 TOTAL: 88.00 SESSION SCORE: 88.00 PERCENT: 46.56 CARRY-OVER: 96.00 EVENT SCORE: 184.00 MASTER POINTS: 0.47 Red (Session) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Frank Harlow - Gina Harlow Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 3 -100 0.5 15 S N-S 8 -420 3 2 E N-S 3 -400 0.5 16 W E-W 7 150 4.5 3 S E-W 3 110 4 17 N NONE 7 -50 2.5 4 W BOTH 2 120 2.5 18 E N-S 7 600 6.5 5 N N-S 2 -110 3.5 19 S E-W 6 -100 2 6 E E-W 2 100 5.5 20 W BOTH 6 620 3.5 7 S BOTH 1 620 4.5 21 N N-S 6 -140 4.5 8 W NONE 1 110 6 22 E E-W 5 -660 1.5 9 N E-W 1 200 7 23 S BOTH 5 -90 4 10 E BOTH 9 200 6 24 W NONE 5 -480 4.5 11 S NONE 9 -120 3 25 N E-W 4 -50 3 12 W N-S 9 110 4.5 26 E BOTH 4 -100 2 13 N BOTH 8 90 3 27 S NONE 4 -450 1 14 E NONE 8 100 5 TOTAL: 98.00 SESSION SCORE: 98.00 PERCENT: 51.85 Session rank: 3 CARRY-OVER: 95.06 EVENT SCORE: 193.06 MASTER POINTS: 0.67 Red (Session) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Dodi Walsh - Floyd Kelly Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 5 -100 0.5 15 S N-S 1 -480 0.5 2 E N-S 5 50 5 16 W E-W 9 150 4.5 3 S E-W 5 -50 1 17 N NONE 9 100 6 4 W BOTH 4 120 2.5 18 E N-S 9 200 5 5 N N-S 4 -140 1 19 S E-W 8 -50 3.5 6 E E-W 4 -100 3 20 W BOTH 8 620 3.5 7 S BOTH 3 620 4.5 21 N N-S 8 50 6.5 8 W NONE 3 -100 1 22 E E-W 7 -630 4 9 N E-W 3 -1100 0 23 S BOTH 7 110 7 10 E BOTH 2 -100 3 24 W NONE 7 -500 1 11 S NONE 2 -110 5 25 N E-W 6 -50 3 12 W N-S 2 150 6 26 E BOTH 6 -300 0.5 13 N BOTH 1 90 3 27 S NONE 6 -100 6 14 E NONE 1 -100 2.5 TOTAL: 89.00 SESSION SCORE: 89.00 PERCENT: 47.09 CARRY-OVER: 92.50 EVENT SCORE: 181.50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Richard Dill - Diane Livingstone Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 7 90 2 15 S N-S 3 150 7 2 E N-S 7 100 6.5 16 W E-W 2 150 4.5 3 S E-W 7 -50 1 17 N NONE 2 -50 2.5 4 W BOTH 6 180 5 18 E N-S 2 600 6.5 5 N N-S 6 110 7 19 S E-W 1 -140 0.5 6 E E-W 6 -110 2 20 W BOTH 1 650 7 7 S BOTH 5 650 7 21 N N-S 1 -140 4.5 8 W NONE 5 -100 1 22 E E-W 9 -600 5 9 N E-W 5 -200 2 23 S BOTH 9 -100 3 10 E BOTH 4 -800 0 24 W NONE 9 -480 4.5 11 S NONE 4 -140 1.5 25 N E-W 8 -50 3 12 W N-S 4 -100 2 26 E BOTH 8 620 5 13 N BOTH 3 120 7 27 S NONE 8 -170 5 14 E NONE 3 420 7 TOTAL: 109.00 SESSION SCORE: 109.00 PERCENT: 57.67 Session rank: 2 CARRY-OVER: 97.88 EVENT SCORE: 206.88 Event rank: 3 MASTER POINTS: 1.41 Gold, 4.22 Red (Overall) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Cheryl Macintosh - Ginny Saunders Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 9 130 4 15 S N-S 5 -420 3 2 E N-S 9 -130 3.5 16 W E-W 4 -300 0 3 S E-W 9 -50 1 17 N NONE 4 -110 0 4 W BOTH 8 130 4 18 E N-S 4 -420 0.5 5 N N-S 8 -100 5 19 S E-W 3 200 7 6 E E-W 8 100 5.5 20 W BOTH 3 170 0 7 S BOTH 7 -100 1.5 21 N N-S 3 -210 2 8 W NONE 7 -50 3 22 E E-W 2 -660 1.5 9 N E-W 7 -90 5 23 S BOTH 2 100 5.5 10 E BOTH 6 200 6 24 W NONE 2 -480 4.5 11 S NONE 6 -110 5 25 N E-W 1 420 6.5 12 W N-S 6 -200 0 26 E BOTH 1 650 7 13 N BOTH 5 90 3 27 S NONE 1 -450 1 14 E NONE 5 -100 2.5 TOTAL: 87.50 SESSION SCORE: 87.50 PERCENT: 46.30 CARRY-OVER: 108.00 EVENT SCORE: 195.50 MASTER POINTS: 1.34 Red (Session) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Ray Long - Shirley Long Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 2 130 4 15 S N-S 7 -480 0.5 2 E N-S 2 100 6.5 16 W E-W 6 140 2 3 S E-W 2 110 4 17 N NONE 6 50 5 4 W BOTH 1 100 1 18 E N-S 6 -170 2 5 N N-S 1 -140 1 19 S E-W 5 -140 0.5 6 E E-W 1 100 5.5 20 W BOTH 5 620 3.5 7 S BOTH 9 620 4.5 21 N N-S 5 -460 0 8 W NONE 9 90 4 22 E E-W 4 -660 1.5 9 N E-W 9 100 6 23 S BOTH 4 -140 1.5 10 E BOTH 8 -200 1 24 W NONE 4 -500 1 11 S NONE 8 -110 5 25 N E-W 3 -50 3 12 W N-S 8 50 3 26 E BOTH 3 -300 0.5 13 N BOTH 7 90 3 27 S NONE 3 -450 1 14 E NONE 7 -130 0 TOTAL: 70.50 SESSION SCORE: 70.50 PERCENT: 37.30 CARRY-OVER: 84.94 EVENT SCORE: 155.44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Ellen Ayer - Clare Morris Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 4 130 4 15 S N-S 9 -420 3 2 E N-S 4 -400 0.5 16 W E-W 8 400 7 3 S E-W 4 200 6.5 17 N NONE 8 110 7 4 W BOTH 3 630 6.5 18 E N-S 8 50 3 5 N N-S 3 90 6 19 S E-W 7 100 6 6 E E-W 3 100 5.5 20 W BOTH 7 620 3.5 7 S BOTH 2 620 4.5 21 N N-S 7 50 6.5 8 W NONE 2 110 6 22 E E-W 6 -130 6 9 N E-W 2 -200 2 23 S BOTH 6 100 5.5 10 E BOTH 1 200 6 24 W NONE 6 -480 4.5 11 S NONE 1 -140 1.5 25 N E-W 5 -50 3 12 W N-S 1 -140 1 26 E BOTH 5 200 3 13 N BOTH 9 90 3 27 S NONE 5 -420 3.5 14 E NONE 9 300 6 TOTAL: 120.50 SESSION SCORE: 120.50 PERCENT: 63.76 Session rank: 1 CARRY-OVER: 83.00 EVENT SCORE: 203.50 Event rank: 4 MASTER POINTS: 1.06 Gold, 3.16 Red (Overall) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Gilbert Ross Meredith - Guy Maugeais Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 6 400 6 15 S N-S 2 100 5.5 2 E N-S 6 -130 3.5 16 W E-W 1 -100 1 3 S E-W 6 200 6.5 17 N NONE 1 -50 2.5 4 W BOTH 5 630 6.5 18 E N-S 1 100 4 5 N N-S 5 -110 3.5 19 S E-W 9 -50 3.5 6 E E-W 5 -140 0.5 20 W BOTH 9 620 3.5 7 S BOTH 4 -300 0 21 N N-S 9 -150 3 8 W NONE 4 -100 1 22 E E-W 8 100 7 9 N E-W 4 -200 2 23 S BOTH 8 -200 0 10 E BOTH 3 -100 3 24 W NONE 8 -500 1 11 S NONE 3 100 7 25 N E-W 7 -100 0 12 W N-S 3 600 7 26 E BOTH 7 620 5 13 N BOTH 2 90 3 27 S NONE 7 100 7 14 E NONE 2 -110 1 TOTAL: 93.50 SESSION SCORE: 93.50 PERCENT: 49.47 Session rank: 4 CARRY-OVER: 91.13 EVENT SCORE: 184.63 MASTER POINTS: 0.47 Red (Session) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Haixin Xu - Rick Sparkman Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 1 -430 0 13 N BOTH 3 -90 4 2 E N-S 1 150 5 14 E NONE 3 100 4.5 3 S E-W 1 -110 3 15 S N-S 3 480 6.5 4 W BOTH 6 -100 6 16 W E-W 8 100 6 5 N N-S 6 140 6 17 N NONE 8 50 4.5 6 E E-W 6 -100 1.5 18 E N-S 8 -100 3 7 S BOTH 2 -620 2.5 19 S E-W 4 140 6.5 8 W NONE 2 -110 1 20 W BOTH 4 -650 0 9 N E-W 2 -200 0 21 N N-S 4 140 2.5 10 E BOTH 7 -200 1 25 N E-W 5 -420 0.5 11 S NONE 7 140 5.5 26 E BOTH 5 -650 0 12 W N-S 7 140 6 27 S NONE 5 450 6 TOTAL: 81.50 SESSION SCORE: 91.69 PERCENT: 48.51 Session rank: 4 CARRY-OVER: 107.44 EVENT SCORE: 199.13 MASTER POINTS: 1.41 Red (Session) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Frank Miller - Don Lutz Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 6 -130 3 13 N BOTH 8 -90 4 2 E N-S 6 -100 0.5 14 E NONE 8 110 6 3 S E-W 6 -110 3 15 S N-S 8 -100 1.5 4 W BOTH 2 -120 4.5 16 W E-W 4 -150 2.5 5 N N-S 2 110 3.5 17 N NONE 4 50 4.5 6 E E-W 2 -100 1.5 18 E N-S 4 -600 0.5 7 S BOTH 7 -620 2.5 22 E E-W 5 660 5.5 8 W NONE 7 -110 1 23 S BOTH 5 -100 1.5 9 N E-W 7 200 5 24 W NONE 5 480 2.5 10 E BOTH 3 100 4 25 N E-W 1 -420 0.5 11 S NONE 3 110 2 26 E BOTH 1 -620 2 12 W N-S 3 -150 1 27 S NONE 1 420 3.5 TOTAL: 66.00 SESSION SCORE: 74.25 PERCENT: 39.29 CARRY-OVER: 98.00 EVENT SCORE: 172.25 MASTER POINTS: 0.67 Red (Session) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Dan Regimbal - Joan Regimbal Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 2 100 6.5 13 N BOTH 4 -120 0 2 E N-S 2 400 6.5 14 E NONE 4 -420 0 3 S E-W 2 -110 3 15 S N-S 4 -150 0 4 W BOTH 7 -630 0.5 19 S E-W 5 -200 0 5 N N-S 7 -90 1 20 W BOTH 5 -170 7 6 E E-W 7 -100 1.5 21 N N-S 5 210 5 7 S BOTH 3 -620 2.5 22 E E-W 1 660 5.5 8 W NONE 3 100 6 23 S BOTH 1 140 5.5 9 N E-W 3 1100 7 24 W NONE 1 450 0 10 E BOTH 8 100 4 25 N E-W 6 50 4 11 S NONE 8 -100 0 26 E BOTH 6 300 6.5 12 W N-S 8 -600 0 27 S NONE 6 450 6 TOTAL: 78.00 SESSION SCORE: 87.75 PERCENT: 46.43 CARRY-OVER: 114.19 EVENT SCORE: 201.94 Event rank: 5 MASTER POINTS: 0.79 Gold, 2.37 Red (Overall) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Bob Feng - Jason Feng Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 7 -130 3 16 W E-W 5 300 7 2 E N-S 7 400 6.5 17 N NONE 5 110 7 3 S E-W 7 -200 0.5 18 E N-S 5 420 6.5 4 W BOTH 3 -120 4.5 19 S E-W 1 -90 2 5 N N-S 3 140 6 20 W BOTH 1 -620 3.5 6 E E-W 3 100 4 21 N N-S 1 230 6 7 S BOTH 8 300 7 22 E E-W 6 660 5.5 8 W NONE 8 100 6 23 S BOTH 6 140 5.5 9 N E-W 8 200 5 24 W NONE 6 500 6 10 E BOTH 4 800 7 25 N E-W 2 50 4 11 S NONE 4 140 5.5 26 E BOTH 2 100 5 12 W N-S 4 100 5 27 S NONE 2 450 6 TOTAL: 124.00 SESSION SCORE: 139.50 PERCENT: 73.81 Session rank: 1 CARRY-OVER: 103.50 EVENT SCORE: 243.00 Event rank: 1 MASTER POINTS: 2.50 Gold, 7.50 Red (Overall) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Mike Tanner - Dave Tanner Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 3 100 6.5 16 W E-W 1 -150 2.5 2 E N-S 3 -50 2 17 N NONE 1 50 4.5 3 S E-W 3 50 6 18 E N-S 1 420 6.5 4 W BOTH 8 -630 0.5 19 S E-W 6 140 6.5 5 N N-S 8 110 3.5 20 W BOTH 6 -620 3.5 6 E E-W 8 140 6.5 21 N N-S 6 460 7 7 S BOTH 4 -650 0 22 E E-W 2 660 5.5 8 W NONE 4 100 6 23 S BOTH 2 90 3 9 N E-W 4 200 5 24 W NONE 2 480 2.5 13 N BOTH 5 -90 4 25 N E-W 7 50 4 14 E NONE 5 100 4.5 26 E BOTH 7 -200 4 15 S N-S 5 420 4 27 S NONE 7 420 3.5 TOTAL: 101.50 SESSION SCORE: 114.19 PERCENT: 60.42 Session rank: 2 CARRY-OVER: 99.00 EVENT SCORE: 213.19 Event rank: 2 MASTER POINTS: 1.88 Gold, 5.62 Red (Overall) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Mary Lynn Macdonald - M Candace Flemming Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 8 -400 1 16 W E-W 6 -140 5 2 E N-S 8 130 3.5 17 N NONE 6 -50 2 3 S E-W 8 -200 0.5 18 E N-S 6 170 5 4 W BOTH 4 -180 2 19 S E-W 2 100 5 5 N N-S 4 -110 0 20 W BOTH 2 -620 3.5 6 E E-W 4 110 5 21 N N-S 2 140 2.5 10 E BOTH 5 -200 1 22 E E-W 7 130 1 11 S NONE 5 110 2 23 S BOTH 7 -100 1.5 12 W N-S 5 200 7 24 W NONE 7 480 2.5 13 N BOTH 1 -90 4 25 N E-W 3 50 4 14 E NONE 1 -50 3 26 E BOTH 3 300 6.5 15 S N-S 1 -100 1.5 27 S NONE 3 100 1 TOTAL: 70.00 SESSION SCORE: 78.75 PERCENT: 41.67 CARRY-OVER: 92.00 EVENT SCORE: 170.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Cynthia Burney - Linda Smith Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 4 -90 5 16 W E-W 2 -150 2.5 2 E N-S 4 -100 0.5 17 N NONE 2 50 4.5 3 S E-W 4 50 6 18 E N-S 2 -600 0.5 7 S BOTH 5 100 5.5 19 S E-W 7 -100 1 8 W NONE 5 50 4 20 W BOTH 7 -620 3.5 9 N E-W 5 90 2 21 N N-S 7 -50 0.5 10 E BOTH 1 100 4 22 E E-W 3 630 3 11 S NONE 1 170 7 23 S BOTH 3 -110 0 12 W N-S 1 -110 2.5 24 W NONE 3 500 6 13 N BOTH 6 -90 4 25 N E-W 8 100 7 14 E NONE 6 130 7 26 E BOTH 8 -620 2 15 S N-S 6 480 6.5 27 S NONE 8 -100 0 TOTAL: 84.50 SESSION SCORE: 95.06 PERCENT: 50.30 Session rank: 3 CARRY-OVER: 75.94 EVENT SCORE: 171.00 MASTER POINTS: 0.67 Red (Session) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Celia Cobbett - PATTIE MOODY Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 4 W BOTH 5 -130 3 16 W E-W 7 -400 0 5 N N-S 5 100 2 17 N NONE 7 -110 0 6 E E-W 5 -100 1.5 18 E N-S 7 -50 4 7 S BOTH 1 100 5.5 19 S E-W 3 50 3.5 8 W NONE 1 -110 1 20 W BOTH 3 -620 3.5 9 N E-W 1 150 3 21 N N-S 3 -50 0.5 10 E BOTH 6 200 6 22 E E-W 8 -100 0 11 S NONE 6 110 2 23 S BOTH 8 200 7 12 W N-S 6 -50 4 24 W NONE 8 500 6 13 N BOTH 2 -90 4 25 N E-W 4 50 4 14 E NONE 2 -100 2 26 E BOTH 4 -620 2 15 S N-S 2 420 4 27 S NONE 4 170 2 TOTAL: 70.50 SESSION SCORE: 79.31 PERCENT: 41.96 CARRY-OVER: 83.00 EVENT SCORE: 162.31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Melinda Maclean - Margaret House Naopc 2 Session October 30, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 5 -130 3 13 N BOTH 7 -90 4 2 E N-S 5 130 3.5 14 E NONE 7 -300 1 3 S E-W 5 50 6 15 S N-S 7 420 4 4 W BOTH 1 100 7 16 W E-W 3 -150 2.5 5 N N-S 1 140 6 17 N NONE 3 -100 1 6 E E-W 1 140 6.5 18 E N-S 3 -200 2 7 S BOTH 6 -620 2.5 19 S E-W 8 50 3.5 8 W NONE 6 -90 3 20 W BOTH 8 -620 3.5 9 N E-W 6 -100 1 21 N N-S 8 150 4 10 E BOTH 2 -200 1 22 E E-W 4 600 2 11 S NONE 2 120 4 23 S BOTH 4 100 4 12 W N-S 2 -110 2.5 24 W NONE 4 480 2.5 TOTAL: 80.00 SESSION SCORE: 90.00 PERCENT: 47.62 CARRY-OVER: 84.94 EVENT SCORE: 174.94 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|