|
|
2011 - North American Open Pairs Flight "C" 1st Session Naop Flight - C 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Average: 94.5 Section C North-South Pair Pct Score Rank ---- ----- ------ ---- ------- 5 57.14 108.00 1 1.34Red Cheryl Macintosh - Ginny Saunders [Summary] 4 54.76 103.50 2 0.94Red Bob Feng - Jason Feng [Summary] 2 51.85 98.00 3 0.67Red Frank Miller - Don Lutz [Summary] 1 50.79 96.00 4 0.47Red Carol Weir - Marie Rose [Summary] 3 48.94 92.50 Dodi Walsh - Floyd Kelly [Summary] 6 48.68 92.00 Mary Lynn Macdonald - M Candace Flemming [Summary] 7 43.92 83.00 Ellen Ayer - Clare Morris [Summary] 8 43.92 83.00 Celia Cobbett - PATTIE MOODY [Summary] MPts Average: 94.5 Section C East-West Pair Pct Score Rank 3 60.42 114.19 1 1.34Red Dan Regimbal - Joan Regimbal [Summary] 1 56.85 107.44 2 0.94Red Haixin Xu - Rick Sparkman [Summary] 5 52.38 99.00 3 0.67Red Mike Tanner - Dave Tanner [Summary] 4 51.79 97.88 4 0.47Red Richard Dill - Diane Livingstone [Summary] 2 50.30 95.06 Frank Harlow - Gina Harlow [Summary] 8 48.22 91.13 Gilbert Ross Meredith - Guy Maugeais [Summary] 6 44.94 84.94 Ray Long - Shirley Long [Summary] 9 44.94 84.94 Melinda Maclean - Margaret House [Summary] 7 40.18 75.94 Cynthia Burney - Linda Smith [Summary] MPts =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 1 BD: 1 S-KQT62 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: N H-Q763 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: None D-A7 50 3.00 4.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 1-Xu-Sparkman C-J8 50 3.00 4.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal S-854 S-97 <-Makeable contracts-> 50 3.00 4.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 5-Tanner-Tanner H-J8 H-KT94 C D H S NT 50 3.00 4.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 7-Burney-Smith D-J965 D-Q43 = = = = == 50 3.00 4.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 9-Maclean-House C-AQ96 C-K732 N - - 2 2 2 50 3.00 4.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 2-Harlow-Harlow S-AJ3 S - - 2 2 2 170 7.00 0.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 4-Dill-Livingstone H-A52 E 1 - - - - 50 3.00 4.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 6-Long-Long D-KT82 W 1 - - - - C-T54 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 2 BD: 2 S-Q82 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: E H-3 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: N-S D-AQ96 100 5.00 2.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 1-Xu-Sparkman C-A9865 120 0.00 7.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal S-9543 S-AJT6 <-Makeable contracts-> 50 2.50 4.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 5-Tanner-Tanner H-Q875 H-AKJ9 C D H S NT 50 2.50 4.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 7-Burney-Smith D-J72 D-84 = = = = == 110 6.00 1.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 9-Maclean-House C-42 C-KT3 N 3 3 - - - 50 2.50 4.50 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 2-Harlow-Harlow S-K7 S 3 3 - - - 50 2.50 4.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 4-Dill-Livingstone H-T642 E - - 2 2 - 130 7.00 0.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 6-Long-Long D-KT53 W - - 2 2 - C-QJ7 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 3 BD: 3 S-K542 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: S H-972 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: E-W D-AT42 140 5.50 1.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 1-Xu-Sparkman C-J3 620 0.00 7.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal S-QJ9 S-83 <-Makeable contracts-> 170 1.50 5.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 5-Tanner-Tanner H-853 H-AKQT4 C D H S NT 140 5.50 1.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 7-Burney-Smith D-QJ53 D-K76 = = = = == 150 3.50 3.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 9-Maclean-House C-KQ8 C-T94 N - - - 2 - 150 3.50 3.50 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 2-Harlow-Harlow S-AT76 S - - - 2 - 100 7.00 0.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 4-Dill-Livingstone H-J6 E - 2 3 - 2 170 1.50 5.50 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 6-Long-Long D-98 W - 2 3 - 2 C-A7652 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 4 BD: 4 S-5 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: W H-J83 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: Both D-AT9875 650 1.50 5.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 9-Maclean-House C-K74 200 6.00 1.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 2-Harlow-Harlow S-AT93 S-KQ62 <-Makeable contracts-> 650 1.50 5.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 4-Dill-Livingstone H-K754 H-AQ6 C D H S NT 800 0.00 7.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 6-Long-Long D-4 D-J = = = = == 620 4.00 3.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais C-AQT8 C-J9653 N - 2 - - - 620 4.00 3.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 1-Xu-Sparkman S-J874 S - 2 - - - 620 4.00 3.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal H-T92 E 5 - 5 4 1 100 7.00 0.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 5-Tanner-Tanner D-KQ632 W 5 - 5 4 1 C-2 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 5 BD: 5 S-JT9643 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: N H-T N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: N-S D-J765 100 2.00 5.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 9-Maclean-House C-85 200 0.00 7.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 2-Harlow-Harlow S-52 S-7 <-Makeable contracts-> 100 2.00 5.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 4-Dill-Livingstone H-KQ53 H-J87 C D H S NT 140 7.00 0.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 6-Long-Long D-K84 D-AT32 = = = = == 50 5.00 2.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais C-AK97 C-J6432 N - - - 3 - 50 5.00 2.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 1-Xu-Sparkman S-AKQ8 S - - - 3 - 50 5.00 2.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal H-A9642 E 2 2 2 - - 100 2.00 5.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 5-Tanner-Tanner D-Q9 W 2 2 2 - - C-QT =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 6 BD: 6 S-Q74 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: E H-43 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: E-W D-AT 180 2.00 5.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 9-Maclean-House C-K98653 150 4.50 2.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 2-Harlow-Harlow S-K85 S-AJT3 <-Makeable contracts-> 300 0.00 7.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 4-Dill-Livingstone H-K976 H-JT8 C D H S NT 120 6.50 0.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 6-Long-Long D-Q7632 D-98 = = = = == 120 6.50 0.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais C-7 C-AQJ4 N - - - - - 150 4.50 2.50 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 1-Xu-Sparkman S-962 S - - - - - 180 2.00 5.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal H-AQ52 E 1 3 3 3 3 180 2.00 5.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 5-Tanner-Tanner D-KJ54 W 1 3 3 4 3 C-T2 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 7 BD: 7 S-8 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: S H-AJ654 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: Both D-KQJT2 140 7.00 0.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais C-94 990 0.50 6.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 1-Xu-Sparkman S-KJ732 S-AT964 <-Makeable contracts-> 650 3.00 4.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal H-92 H-K3 C D H S NT 990 0.50 6.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 5-Tanner-Tanner D-6 D-974 = = = = == 100 6.00 1.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 7-Burney-Smith C-AJT72 C-Q85 N - 3 3 - - 650 3.00 4.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 9-Maclean-House S-Q5 S - 3 3 - - 200 5.00 2.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 2-Harlow-Harlow H-QT87 E 5 - - 5 1 650 3.00 4.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 4-Dill-Livingstone D-A853 W 5 - - 5 1 C-K63 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 8 BD: 8 S-863 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: W H-JT32 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: None D-873 50 5.00 2.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais C-J53 1020 0.00 7.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 1-Xu-Sparkman S-T42 S-AJ <-Makeable contracts-> 990 1.50 5.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal H-AQ5 H-K976 C D H S NT 50 5.00 2.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 5-Tanner-Tanner D-KQJ92 D-A = = = = == 490 3.00 4.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 7-Burney-Smith C-94 C-AKT862 N - - - - - 50 5.00 2.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 9-Maclean-House S-KQ975 S - - - - - 100 7.00 0.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 2-Harlow-Harlow H-84 E 6 7 6 4 6 990 1.50 5.50 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 4-Dill-Livingstone D-T654 W 6 7 6 4 6 C-Q7 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 9 BD: 9 S-J853 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: N H-QJT84 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: E-W D-KT 50 6.50 0.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais C-Q8 100 4.00 3.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 1-Xu-Sparkman S-AQ42 S-KT9 <-Makeable contracts-> 100 4.00 3.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal H-53 H- C D H S NT 170 2.00 5.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 5-Tanner-Tanner D-752 D-AQJ843 = = = = == 50 6.50 0.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 7-Burney-Smith C-K975 C-J642 N - - 2 - - 100 4.00 3.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 9-Maclean-House S-76 S - - 2 - - 600 1.00 6.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 2-Harlow-Harlow H-AK9762 E 5 5 - 3 - 790 0.00 7.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 4-Dill-Livingstone D-96 W 5 5 - 3 - C-AT3 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 10 BD: 10 S-87643 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: E H-J96 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: Both D-J3 130 5.00 2.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 7-Burney-Smith C-A96 200 7.00 0.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 9-Maclean-House S-2 S-KJ9 <-Makeable contracts-> 630 3.50 3.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 2-Harlow-Harlow H-K7 H-AQ542 C D H S NT 690 0.50 6.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 4-Dill-Livingstone D-AK8542 D-Q7 = = = = == 110 6.00 1.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 6-Long-Long C-K732 C-854 N - - - 1 - 630 3.50 3.50 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais S-AQT5 S - - - 1 - 690 0.50 6.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 1-Xu-Sparkman H-T83 E 3 3 3 - 2 660 2.00 5.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal D-T96 W 3 3 3 - - C-QJT =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 11 BD: 11 S-9 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: S H-A742 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: None D-K7642 430 6.00 1.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 7-Burney-Smith C-K64 140 1.50 5.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 9-Maclean-House S-86 S-5432 <-Makeable contracts-> 50 0.00 7.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 2-Harlow-Harlow H-JT963 H-K85 C D H S NT 460 7.00 0.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 4-Dill-Livingstone D-J9 D-AT53 = = = = == 400 5.00 2.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 6-Long-Long C-AQT7 C-98 N 2 2 - 3 1 200 4.00 3.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais S-AKQJT7 S 2 2 - 3 1 140 1.50 5.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 1-Xu-Sparkman H-Q E - - 2 - - 170 3.00 4.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal D-Q8 W - - 2 - - C-J532 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 12 BD: 12 S-965 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: W H-A92 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: N-S D-K62 90 4.00 3.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 7-Burney-Smith C-AT65 120 1.00 6.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 9-Maclean-House S-KT43 S-QJ <-Makeable contracts-> 120 1.00 6.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 2-Harlow-Harlow H-74 H-KT653 C D H S NT 100 6.50 0.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 4-Dill-Livingstone D-AQT D-7543 = = = = == 100 6.50 0.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 6-Long-Long C-K984 C-Q7 N - - - - - 120 1.00 6.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais S-A872 S - - - - - 110 3.00 4.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 1-Xu-Sparkman H-QJ8 E 1 2 2 1 1 PASS 5.00 2.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal D-J98 W 1 2 2 1 1 C-J32 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 13 BD: 13 S-94 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: N H-K3 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: Both D-QT75432 650 2.50 4.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 6-Long-Long C-87 620 5.00 2.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais S- S-AKT876532 <-Makeable contracts-> 100 6.50 0.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 1-Xu-Sparkman H-Q987652 H-A4 C D H S NT 100 6.50 0.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal D-J D-9 = = = = == 850 0.00 7.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 5-Tanner-Tanner C-KQT43 C-6 N - 3 - - - 650 2.50 4.50 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 7-Burney-Smith S-QJ S - 3 - - - 650 2.50 4.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 9-Maclean-House H-JT E 1 - 4 4 - 650 2.50 4.50 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 2-Harlow-Harlow D-AK86 W 1 - 4 4 - C-AJ952 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 14 BD: 14 S-982 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: E H-K743 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: None D-KJ532 480 0.50 6.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 6-Long-Long C-7 440 2.00 5.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais S-AQT54 S-K6 <-Makeable contracts-> 120 6.00 1.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 1-Xu-Sparkman H-J82 H-5 C D H S NT 480 0.50 6.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal D-76 D-AQT9 = = = = == 110 7.00 0.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 5-Tanner-Tanner C-AKJ C-Q98643 N - - - - - 150 5.00 2.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 7-Burney-Smith S-J73 S - - - - - 190 4.00 3.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 9-Maclean-House H-AQT96 E 6 3 1 6 2 420 3.00 4.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 2-Harlow-Harlow D-84 W 6 3 1 6 2 C-T52 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 15 BD: 15 S-83 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: S H-9862 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: N-S D-KT87 450 3.00 4.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 6-Long-Long C-J76 450 3.00 4.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais S-AKJ9 S-Q765 <-Makeable contracts-> 460 0.00 7.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 1-Xu-Sparkman H-AT3 H-KQ4 C D H S NT 50 7.00 0.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal D-A64 D-Q532 = = = = == 450 3.00 4.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 5-Tanner-Tanner C-K93 C-Q2 N - - - - - 450 3.00 4.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 7-Burney-Smith S-T42 S - - - - - 450 3.00 4.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 9-Maclean-House H-J75 E 2 4 4 5 4 430 6.00 1.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 2-Harlow-Harlow D-J9 W 2 4 4 5 4 C-AT854 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 16 BD: 16 S-T76 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: W H-AT954 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: E-W D-K62 50 4.00 3.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 5-Tanner-Tanner C-87 110 7.00 0.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 7-Burney-Smith S-Q2 S-AJ943 <-Makeable contracts-> 50 4.00 3.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 9-Maclean-House H-Q6 H-8 C D H S NT 50 4.00 3.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 2-Harlow-Harlow D-J984 D-A53 = = = = == 50 4.00 3.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 4-Dill-Livingstone C-KT542 C-A963 N - - 2 - - 50 4.00 3.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 6-Long-Long S-K85 S - - 2 - - 90 1.00 6.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais H-KJ732 E 4 2 - 4 1 130 0.00 7.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 1-Xu-Sparkman D-QT7 W 4 2 - 4 1 C-QJ =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 17 BD: 17 S-987 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: N H-75 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: None D-A9732 50 5.50 1.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 5-Tanner-Tanner C-A85 50 5.50 1.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 7-Burney-Smith S-AJ5 S-KQ62 <-Makeable contracts-> 50 5.50 1.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 9-Maclean-House H-KJ9832 H-AQT6 C D H S NT 50 5.50 1.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 2-Harlow-Harlow D-T D-6 = = = = == 100 3.00 4.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 4-Dill-Livingstone C-JT4 C-9762 N - 3 - - - 300 1.00 6.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 6-Long-Long S-T43 S - 3 - - - 450 0.00 7.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais H-4 E 2 - 3 3 - 140 2.00 5.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 1-Xu-Sparkman D-KQJ854 W 2 - 3 3 - C-KQ3 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 18 BD: 18 S-9 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: E H-AK65 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: N-S D-32 50 2.00 5.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 5-Tanner-Tanner C-AT9852 620 5.50 1.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 7-Burney-Smith S-AJ83 S-T7642 <-Makeable contracts-> 650 7.00 0.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 9-Maclean-House H-QJT H-98 C D H S NT 100 1.00 6.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 2-Harlow-Harlow D-9764 D-A5 = = = = == 110 3.00 4.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 4-Dill-Livingstone C-QJ C-K763 N 2 3 4 - - 620 5.50 1.50 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 6-Long-Long S-KQ5 S 2 3 4 - - 200 0.00 7.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais H-7432 E - - - 1 - 500 4.00 3.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 1-Xu-Sparkman D-KQJT8 W - - - 1 - C-4 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 19 BD: 19 S-962 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: S H-AJ N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: E-W D-A84 420 4.50 2.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 4-Dill-Livingstone C-Q9532 230 1.00 6.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 6-Long-Long S-AQ43 S-KJ5 <-Makeable contracts-> 420 4.50 2.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais H-T96 H-42 C D H S NT 420 4.50 2.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 1-Xu-Sparkman D-Q75 D-JT963 = = = = == 200 0.00 7.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal C-874 C-KT6 N 3 1 4 2 3 420 4.50 2.50 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 5-Tanner-Tanner S-T87 S 3 1 4 2 3 420 4.50 2.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 7-Burney-Smith H-KQ8753 E - - - - - 420 4.50 2.50 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 9-Maclean-House D-K2 W - - - - - C-AJ =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 20 BD: 20 S-T54 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: W H-85 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: Both D-A642 650 1.00 6.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 4-Dill-Livingstone C-K832 100 6.50 0.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 6-Long-Long S-AQJ76 S-3 <-Makeable contracts-> 650 1.00 6.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais H-AT96 H-KQ42 C D H S NT 620 4.00 3.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 1-Xu-Sparkman D-T98 D-K3 = = = = == 650 1.00 6.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal C-7 C-AQ9654 N - - - - - 620 4.00 3.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 5-Tanner-Tanner S-K982 S - - - - - 620 4.00 3.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 7-Burney-Smith H-J73 E 4 2 6 4 3 100 6.50 0.50 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 9-Maclean-House D-QJ75 W 4 2 6 4 3 C-JT =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 21 BD: 21 S-AKQJ SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: N H-AT8 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: N-S D-752 600 4.00 3.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 4-Dill-Livingstone C-A98 600 4.00 3.00 2-Miller-Lutz vs 6-Long-Long S-T95 S-76432 <-Makeable contracts-> 630 7.00 0.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais H-32 H-KQJ6 C D H S NT 100 0.00 7.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 1-Xu-Sparkman D-KJ43 D-9 = = = = == 600 4.00 3.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal C-J654 C-Q72 N 2 4 3 3 4 120 1.00 6.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 5-Tanner-Tanner S-8 S 2 4 3 3 4 600 4.00 3.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 7-Burney-Smith H-9754 E - - - - - 600 4.00 3.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 9-Maclean-House D-AQT86 W - - - - - C-KT3 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 22 BD: 22 S-765 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: E H-T4 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: E-W D-KT63 90 2.50 4.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal C-KQ98 110 6.50 0.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 5-Tanner-Tanner S-A84 S-KQ92 <-Makeable contracts-> 110 6.50 0.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 7-Burney-Smith H-8752 H-J93 C D H S NT 90 2.50 4.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 9-Maclean-House D-A97 D-85 = = = = == 90 2.50 4.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 2-Harlow-Harlow C-AT7 C-6542 N 1 2 - 1 1 50 0.00 7.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 4-Dill-Livingstone S-JT3 S 1 2 - - 1 90 2.50 4.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 6-Long-Long H-AKQ6 E - - - - - 100 5.00 2.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais D-QJ42 W - - - - - C-J3 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 23 BD: 23 S-8 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: S H-Q9874 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: Both D-AKJ764 130 1.00 6.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal C-K 150 3.50 3.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 5-Tanner-Tanner S-952 S-AKT764 <-Makeable contracts-> 100 0.00 7.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 7-Burney-Smith H-KJ653 H-A2 C D H S NT 500 6.00 1.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 9-Maclean-House D-Q5 D-92 = = = = == 600 7.00 0.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 2-Harlow-Harlow C-J86 C-742 N 4 5 2 - 3 150 3.50 3.50 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 4-Dill-Livingstone S-QJ3 S 4 5 2 - 3 150 3.50 3.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 6-Long-Long H-T E - - - 1 - 150 3.50 3.50 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais D-T83 W - - - 1 - C-AQT953 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 24 BD: 24 S-9 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: W H-AT63 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: None D-KJ42 140 1.50 5.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal C-J952 200 6.50 0.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 5-Tanner-Tanner S-A7 S-T54 <-Makeable contracts-> 200 6.50 0.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 7-Burney-Smith H-KJ852 H-Q4 C D H S NT 150 3.50 3.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 9-Maclean-House D-Q6 D-T9875 = = = = == 150 3.50 3.50 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 2-Harlow-Harlow C-7643 C-AKQ N - - - 3 1 170 5.00 2.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 4-Dill-Livingstone S-KQJ8632 S - - - 3 1 140 1.50 5.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 6-Long-Long H-97 E 1 1 1 - - 100 0.00 7.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais D-A3 W 1 1 1 - - C-T8 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 25 BD: 25 S-T4 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: N H-7654 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: E-W D-K743 650 6.50 0.50 1-Weir-Rose vs 2-Harlow-Harlow C-643 650 6.50 0.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 4-Dill-Livingstone S-J8762 S-AK53 <-Makeable contracts-> 1430 1.00 6.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 6-Long-Long H-A8 H-KJ C D H S NT 680 4.00 3.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais D-AT9 D-Q852 = = = = == 680 4.00 3.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 1-Xu-Sparkman C-K95 C-AJT N - - - - - 1430 1.00 6.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal S-Q9 S - - - - - 1430 1.00 6.00 7-Ayer-Morris vs 5-Tanner-Tanner H-QT932 E 4 6 2 6 6 680 4.00 3.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 7-Burney-Smith D-J6 W 4 6 2 6 6 C-Q872 =================================================================================== RESULTS OF BOARD 26 BD: 26 S-AQ942 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: E H-K5 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: Both D-A432 200 4.00 3.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 2-Harlow-Harlow C-T6 100 1.50 5.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 4-Dill-Livingstone S-T3 S-J8 <-Makeable contracts-> 620 7.00 0.00 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 6-Long-Long H-Q964 H-AT32 C D H S NT 200 4.00 3.00 4-Feng-Feng vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais D-QJ8 D-9 = = = = == 200 4.00 3.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 1-Xu-Sparkman C-QJ74 C-AK9832 N - 4 - 4 - 500 6.00 1.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal S-K765 S - 4 - 4 - 100 1.50 5.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 5-Tanner-Tanner H-J87 E 3 - 2 - - 140 0.00 7.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 7-Burney-Smith D-KT765 W 3 - 2 - - C-5 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] RESULTS OF BOARD 27 BD: 27 S-T65 SCORES MATCHPOINTS NAMES Dlr: S H-A832 N-S E-W N-S E-W Vul: None D-KQ65 400 1.00 6.00 1-Weir-Rose vs 2-Harlow-Harlow C-K9 460 6.50 0.50 2-Miller-Lutz vs 4-Dill-Livingstone S-9432 S-AJ8 <-Makeable contracts-> 460 6.50 0.50 3-Walsh-Kelly vs 6-Long-Long H-JT75 H-Q6 C D H S NT 430 4.50 2.50 4-Feng-Feng vs 8-Meredith-Maugeais D-4 D-J983 = = = = == 400 1.00 6.00 5-Macintosh-Saunders vs 1-Xu-Sparkman C-J842 C-QT76 N 2 5 4 3 4 420 3.00 4.00 6-Macdonald-Flemming vs 3-Regimbal-Regimbal S-KQ7 S 2 5 4 3 4 430 4.50 2.50 7-Ayer-Morris vs 5-Tanner-Tanner H-K94 E - - - - - 400 1.00 6.00 8-Cobbett-MOODY vs 7-Burney-Smith D-AT72 W - - - - - C-A53 =================================================================================== [Top] Boards: [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 5 ] [ 7 ] [ 9 ] [ 11 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 17 ] [ 19 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] [ 25 ] [ 27 ] [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Carol Weir - Marie Rose NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 1 -50 3 15 S N-S 6 -450 3 2 E N-S 1 100 5 16 W E-W 5 -50 4 3 S E-W 1 -140 5.5 17 N NONE 5 50 5.5 4 W BOTH 9 -650 1.5 18 E N-S 5 50 2 5 N N-S 9 -100 2 19 S E-W 4 420 4.5 6 E E-W 9 -180 2 20 W BOTH 4 -650 1 7 S BOTH 8 140 7 21 N N-S 4 600 4 8 W NONE 8 50 5 22 E E-W 3 90 2.5 9 N E-W 8 -50 6.5 23 S BOTH 3 130 1 10 E BOTH 7 -130 5 24 W NONE 3 140 1.5 11 S NONE 7 430 6 25 N E-W 2 -650 6.5 12 W N-S 7 -90 4 26 E BOTH 2 200 4 13 N BOTH 6 -650 2.5 27 S NONE 2 400 1 14 E NONE 6 -480 0.5 TOTAL: 96.00 SESSION SCORE: 96.00 PERCENT: 50.79 Session rank: 4 MASTER POINTS: 0.47 Red ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Frank Miller - Don Lutz NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 3 -50 3 15 S N-S 8 -450 3 2 E N-S 3 -120 0 16 W E-W 7 110 7 3 S E-W 3 -620 0 17 N NONE 7 50 5.5 4 W BOTH 2 -200 6 18 E N-S 7 620 5.5 5 N N-S 2 -200 0 19 S E-W 6 230 1 6 E E-W 2 -150 4.5 20 W BOTH 6 100 6.5 7 S BOTH 1 -990 0.5 21 N N-S 6 600 4 8 W NONE 1 -1020 0 22 E E-W 5 110 6.5 9 N E-W 1 -100 4 23 S BOTH 5 150 3.5 10 E BOTH 9 200 7 24 W NONE 5 200 6.5 11 S NONE 9 140 1.5 25 N E-W 4 -650 6.5 12 W N-S 9 -120 1 26 E BOTH 4 100 1.5 13 N BOTH 8 -620 5 27 S NONE 4 460 6.5 14 E NONE 8 -440 2 TOTAL: 98.00 SESSION SCORE: 98.00 PERCENT: 51.85 Session rank: 3 MASTER POINTS: 0.67 Red ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Dodi Walsh - Floyd Kelly NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 5 -50 3 15 S N-S 1 -460 0 2 E N-S 5 50 2.5 16 W E-W 9 -50 4 3 S E-W 5 -170 1.5 17 N NONE 9 50 5.5 4 W BOTH 4 -650 1.5 18 E N-S 9 650 7 5 N N-S 4 -100 2 19 S E-W 8 420 4.5 6 E E-W 4 -300 0 20 W BOTH 8 -650 1 7 S BOTH 3 -650 3 21 N N-S 8 630 7 8 W NONE 3 -990 1.5 22 E E-W 7 110 6.5 9 N E-W 3 -100 4 23 S BOTH 7 100 0 10 E BOTH 2 -630 3.5 24 W NONE 7 200 6.5 11 S NONE 2 -50 0 25 N E-W 6 -1430 1 12 W N-S 2 -120 1 26 E BOTH 6 620 7 13 N BOTH 1 100 6.5 27 S NONE 6 460 6.5 14 E NONE 1 -120 6 TOTAL: 92.50 SESSION SCORE: 92.50 PERCENT: 48.94 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Bob Feng - Jason Feng NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 7 -50 3 15 S N-S 3 50 7 2 E N-S 7 50 2.5 16 W E-W 2 -50 4 3 S E-W 7 -140 5.5 17 N NONE 2 50 5.5 4 W BOTH 6 -800 0 18 E N-S 2 -100 1 5 N N-S 6 140 7 19 S E-W 1 420 4.5 6 E E-W 6 -120 6.5 20 W BOTH 1 -620 4 7 S BOTH 5 -990 0.5 21 N N-S 1 -100 0 8 W NONE 5 50 5 22 E E-W 9 90 2.5 9 N E-W 5 -170 2 23 S BOTH 9 500 6 10 E BOTH 4 -690 0.5 24 W NONE 9 150 3.5 11 S NONE 4 460 7 25 N E-W 8 -680 4 12 W N-S 4 100 6.5 26 E BOTH 8 200 4 13 N BOTH 3 100 6.5 27 S NONE 8 430 4.5 14 E NONE 3 -480 0.5 TOTAL: 103.50 SESSION SCORE: 103.50 PERCENT: 54.76 Session rank: 2 MASTER POINTS: 0.94 Red ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Cheryl Macintosh - Ginny Saunders NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 9 -50 3 15 S N-S 5 -450 3 2 E N-S 9 110 6 16 W E-W 4 -50 4 3 S E-W 9 -150 3.5 17 N NONE 4 -100 3 4 W BOTH 8 -620 4 18 E N-S 4 110 3 5 N N-S 8 50 5 19 S E-W 3 200 0 6 E E-W 8 -120 6.5 20 W BOTH 3 -650 1 7 S BOTH 7 -100 6 21 N N-S 3 600 4 8 W NONE 7 -490 3 22 E E-W 2 90 2.5 9 N E-W 7 -50 6.5 23 S BOTH 2 600 7 10 E BOTH 6 -110 6 24 W NONE 2 150 3.5 11 S NONE 6 400 5 25 N E-W 1 -680 4 12 W N-S 6 100 6.5 26 E BOTH 1 200 4 13 N BOTH 5 -850 0 27 S NONE 1 400 1 14 E NONE 5 -110 7 TOTAL: 108.00 SESSION SCORE: 108.00 PERCENT: 57.14 Session rank: 1 MASTER POINTS: 1.34 Red ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Mary Lynn Macdonald - M Candace Flemming NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 2 -50 3 15 S N-S 7 -450 3 2 E N-S 2 50 2.5 16 W E-W 6 -50 4 3 S E-W 2 -150 3.5 17 N NONE 6 -300 1 4 W BOTH 1 -620 4 18 E N-S 6 620 5.5 5 N N-S 1 50 5 19 S E-W 5 420 4.5 6 E E-W 1 -150 4.5 20 W BOTH 5 -620 4 7 S BOTH 9 -650 3 21 N N-S 5 120 1 8 W NONE 9 50 5 22 E E-W 4 -50 0 9 N E-W 9 -100 4 23 S BOTH 4 150 3.5 10 E BOTH 8 -630 3.5 24 W NONE 4 170 5 11 S NONE 8 200 4 25 N E-W 3 -1430 1 12 W N-S 8 -120 1 26 E BOTH 3 500 6 13 N BOTH 7 -650 2.5 27 S NONE 3 420 3 14 E NONE 7 -150 5 TOTAL: 92.00 SESSION SCORE: 92.00 PERCENT: 48.68 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Ellen Ayer - Clare Morris NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 4 170 7 15 S N-S 9 -450 3 2 E N-S 4 50 2.5 16 W E-W 8 -90 1 3 S E-W 4 100 7 17 N NONE 8 -450 0 4 W BOTH 3 -620 4 18 E N-S 8 -200 0 5 N N-S 3 50 5 19 S E-W 7 420 4.5 6 E E-W 3 -180 2 20 W BOTH 7 -620 4 7 S BOTH 2 -200 5 21 N N-S 7 600 4 8 W NONE 2 100 7 22 E E-W 6 90 2.5 9 N E-W 2 -600 1 23 S BOTH 6 150 3.5 10 E BOTH 1 -690 0.5 24 W NONE 6 140 1.5 11 S NONE 1 140 1.5 25 N E-W 5 -1430 1 12 W N-S 1 -110 3 26 E BOTH 5 100 1.5 13 N BOTH 9 -650 2.5 27 S NONE 5 430 4.5 14 E NONE 9 -190 4 TOTAL: 83.00 SESSION SCORE: 83.00 PERCENT: 43.92 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Celia Cobbett - PATTIE MOODY NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 6 -50 3 15 S N-S 2 -430 6 2 E N-S 6 130 7 16 W E-W 1 -130 0 3 S E-W 6 -170 1.5 17 N NONE 1 -140 2 4 W BOTH 5 100 7 18 E N-S 1 500 4 5 N N-S 5 -100 2 19 S E-W 9 420 4.5 6 E E-W 5 -180 2 20 W BOTH 9 100 6.5 7 S BOTH 4 -650 3 21 N N-S 9 600 4 8 W NONE 4 -990 1.5 22 E E-W 8 100 5 9 N E-W 4 -790 0 23 S BOTH 8 150 3.5 10 E BOTH 3 -660 2 24 W NONE 8 -100 0 11 S NONE 3 170 3 25 N E-W 7 -680 4 12 W N-S 3 PASS 5 26 E BOTH 7 -140 0 13 N BOTH 2 -650 2.5 27 S NONE 7 400 1 14 E NONE 2 -420 3 TOTAL: 83.00 SESSION SCORE: 83.00 PERCENT: 43.92 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Haixin Xu - Rick Sparkman NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 1 50 4 13 N BOTH 3 -100 0.5 2 E N-S 1 -100 2 14 E NONE 3 120 1 3 S E-W 1 140 1.5 15 S N-S 3 460 7 4 W BOTH 6 620 3 16 W E-W 8 130 7 5 N N-S 6 -50 2 17 N NONE 8 140 5 6 E E-W 6 150 2.5 18 E N-S 8 -500 3 7 S BOTH 2 990 6.5 19 S E-W 4 -420 2.5 8 W NONE 2 1020 7 20 W BOTH 4 620 3 9 N E-W 2 100 3 21 N N-S 4 100 7 10 E BOTH 7 690 6.5 25 N E-W 5 680 3 11 S NONE 7 -140 5.5 26 E BOTH 5 -200 3 12 W N-S 7 110 4 27 S NONE 5 -400 6 TOTAL: 95.50 SESSION SCORE: 107.44 PERCENT: 56.85 Session rank: 2 MASTER POINTS: 0.94 Red ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Frank Harlow - Gina Harlow NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 6 50 4 13 N BOTH 8 650 4.5 2 E N-S 6 -50 4.5 14 E NONE 8 420 4 3 S E-W 6 150 3.5 15 S N-S 8 430 1 4 W BOTH 2 200 1 16 W E-W 4 50 3 5 N N-S 2 200 7 17 N NONE 4 -50 1.5 6 E E-W 2 150 2.5 18 E N-S 4 100 6 7 S BOTH 7 200 2 22 E E-W 5 -90 4.5 8 W NONE 7 -100 0 23 S BOTH 5 -600 0 9 N E-W 7 600 6 24 W NONE 5 -150 3.5 10 E BOTH 3 630 3.5 25 N E-W 1 650 0.5 11 S NONE 3 50 7 26 E BOTH 1 -200 3 12 W N-S 3 120 6 27 S NONE 1 -400 6 TOTAL: 84.50 SESSION SCORE: 95.06 PERCENT: 50.30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Dan Regimbal - Joan Regimbal NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 2 50 4 13 N BOTH 4 -100 0.5 2 E N-S 2 120 7 14 E NONE 4 480 6.5 3 S E-W 2 620 7 15 S N-S 4 -50 0 4 W BOTH 7 620 3 19 S E-W 5 -200 7 5 N N-S 7 -50 2 20 W BOTH 5 650 6 6 E E-W 7 180 5 21 N N-S 5 -600 3 7 S BOTH 3 650 4 22 E E-W 1 -90 4.5 8 W NONE 3 990 5.5 23 S BOTH 1 -130 6 9 N E-W 3 100 3 24 W NONE 1 -140 5.5 10 E BOTH 8 660 5 25 N E-W 6 1430 6 11 S NONE 8 -170 4 26 E BOTH 6 -500 1 12 W N-S 8 PASS 2 27 S NONE 6 -420 4 TOTAL: 101.50 SESSION SCORE: 114.19 PERCENT: 60.42 Session rank: 1 MASTER POINTS: 1.34 Red ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Richard Dill - Diane Livingstone NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 7 -170 0 16 W E-W 5 50 3 2 E N-S 7 -50 4.5 17 N NONE 5 100 4 3 S E-W 7 -100 0 18 E N-S 5 -110 4 4 W BOTH 3 650 5.5 19 S E-W 1 -420 2.5 5 N N-S 3 100 5 20 W BOTH 1 650 6 6 E E-W 3 300 7 21 N N-S 1 -600 3 7 S BOTH 8 650 4 22 E E-W 6 50 7 8 W NONE 8 990 5.5 23 S BOTH 6 -150 3.5 9 N E-W 8 790 7 24 W NONE 6 -170 2 10 E BOTH 4 690 6.5 25 N E-W 2 650 0.5 11 S NONE 4 -460 0 26 E BOTH 2 -100 5.5 12 W N-S 4 -100 0.5 27 S NONE 2 -460 0.5 TOTAL: 87.00 SESSION SCORE: 97.88 PERCENT: 51.79 Session rank: 4 MASTER POINTS: 0.47 Red ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Mike Tanner - Dave Tanner NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 3 50 4 16 W E-W 1 50 3 2 E N-S 3 -50 4.5 17 N NONE 1 -50 1.5 3 S E-W 3 170 5.5 18 E N-S 1 -50 5 4 W BOTH 8 -100 0 19 S E-W 6 -420 2.5 5 N N-S 8 100 5 20 W BOTH 6 620 3 6 E E-W 8 180 5 21 N N-S 6 -120 6 7 S BOTH 4 990 6.5 22 E E-W 2 -110 0.5 8 W NONE 4 -50 2 23 S BOTH 2 -150 3.5 9 N E-W 4 170 5 24 W NONE 2 -200 0.5 13 N BOTH 5 850 7 25 N E-W 7 1430 6 14 E NONE 5 110 0 26 E BOTH 7 -100 5.5 15 S N-S 5 450 4 27 S NONE 7 -430 2.5 TOTAL: 88.00 SESSION SCORE: 99.00 PERCENT: 52.38 Session rank: 3 MASTER POINTS: 0.67 Red ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Ray Long - Shirley Long NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 8 50 4 16 W E-W 6 50 3 2 E N-S 8 -130 0 17 N NONE 6 300 6 3 S E-W 8 170 5.5 18 E N-S 6 -620 1.5 4 W BOTH 4 800 7 19 S E-W 2 -230 6 5 N N-S 4 -140 0 20 W BOTH 2 -100 0.5 6 E E-W 4 120 0.5 21 N N-S 2 -600 3 10 E BOTH 5 110 1 22 E E-W 7 -90 4.5 11 S NONE 5 -400 2 23 S BOTH 7 -150 3.5 12 W N-S 5 -100 0.5 24 W NONE 7 -140 5.5 13 N BOTH 1 650 4.5 25 N E-W 3 1430 6 14 E NONE 1 480 6.5 26 E BOTH 3 -620 0 15 S N-S 1 450 4 27 S NONE 3 -460 0.5 TOTAL: 75.50 SESSION SCORE: 84.94 PERCENT: 44.94 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Cynthia Burney - Linda Smith NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 4 50 4 16 W E-W 2 -110 0 2 E N-S 4 -50 4.5 17 N NONE 2 -50 1.5 3 S E-W 4 140 1.5 18 E N-S 2 -620 1.5 7 S BOTH 5 100 1 19 S E-W 7 -420 2.5 8 W NONE 5 490 4 20 W BOTH 7 620 3 9 N E-W 5 50 0.5 21 N N-S 7 -600 3 10 E BOTH 1 130 2 22 E E-W 3 -110 0.5 11 S NONE 1 -430 1 23 S BOTH 3 -100 7 12 W N-S 1 90 3 24 W NONE 3 -200 0.5 13 N BOTH 6 650 4.5 25 N E-W 8 680 3 14 E NONE 6 150 2 26 E BOTH 8 140 7 15 S N-S 6 450 4 27 S NONE 8 -400 6 TOTAL: 67.50 SESSION SCORE: 75.94 PERCENT: 40.18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Gilbert Ross Meredith - Guy Maugeais NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 4 W BOTH 5 620 3 16 W E-W 7 90 6 5 N N-S 5 -50 2 17 N NONE 7 450 7 6 E E-W 5 120 0.5 18 E N-S 7 200 7 7 S BOTH 1 -140 0 19 S E-W 3 -420 2.5 8 W NONE 1 -50 2 20 W BOTH 3 650 6 9 N E-W 1 50 0.5 21 N N-S 3 -630 0 10 E BOTH 6 630 3.5 22 E E-W 8 -100 2 11 S NONE 6 -200 3 23 S BOTH 8 -150 3.5 12 W N-S 6 120 6 24 W NONE 8 100 7 13 N BOTH 2 620 2 25 N E-W 4 680 3 14 E NONE 2 440 5 26 E BOTH 4 -200 3 15 S N-S 2 450 4 27 S NONE 4 -430 2.5 TOTAL: 81.00 SESSION SCORE: 91.13 PERCENT: 48.22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Top of Document] Summary for pair: Melinda Maclean - Margaret House NaopC 1of2 Session October 29, 2011 Naop GP1110191 Average: 94.5 Top on a Board: 7 BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE BRD DLR VUL VS RESULT SCORE 1 N NONE 5 50 4 13 N BOTH 7 650 4.5 2 E N-S 5 -110 1 14 E NONE 7 190 3 3 S E-W 5 150 3.5 15 S N-S 7 450 4 4 W BOTH 1 650 5.5 16 W E-W 3 50 3 5 N N-S 1 100 5 17 N NONE 3 -50 1.5 6 E E-W 1 180 5 18 E N-S 3 -650 0 7 S BOTH 6 650 4 19 S E-W 8 -420 2.5 8 W NONE 6 -50 2 20 W BOTH 8 -100 0.5 9 N E-W 6 100 3 21 N N-S 8 -600 3 10 E BOTH 2 -200 0 22 E E-W 4 -90 4.5 11 S NONE 2 -140 5.5 23 S BOTH 4 -500 1 12 W N-S 2 120 6 24 W NONE 4 -150 3.5 TOTAL: 75.50 SESSION SCORE: 84.94 PERCENT: 44.94 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|